27 Mai 2016
May 26, 2016
U.S. President Barack Obama’s historic visit to Hiroshima must give fresh impetus to efforts to rid the world of nuclear weapons. Amid today’s increasingly fraught international political climate, the risks are getting higher. States must take urgent action to safeguard all our futures.
We now know more than ever the dangers of an accidental or deliberate detonation of a nuclear weapon. We also realize that there can be no adequate humanitarian response to such a nightmare scenario.
lfunctions, mishaps, false alarms and misinterpreted information have nearly led to the intentional or accidental detonation of nuclear weapons on numerous occasions since 1945, according to testimonies by experts and former nuclear force officers. In the past two years alone, the organization Global Zero has documented scores of “military incidents” involving nuclear weapons states and their allies, alongside the increasing risks stemming from cyberattacks.
Put this together with recent insight into the appalling long-term health impact of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki explosions themselves, and the sheer human cost of any future nuclear bomb blast, and you have a truly alarming picture.
We were in Hiroshima and Nagasaki last year, speaking to survivors, or hibakusha, as they are known. More than 70 years on, their lives, and the lives of countless people in Japan, are still overshadowed by these two watershed events in the history of modern warfare.
After the atomic blasts, Red Cross staff struggled in unimaginable conditions to relieve the suffering. With hospitals reduced to rubble and ash, and medical supplies contaminated, the provision of even basic health care was well nigh impossible.
But the nightmare is far from over even today.
Doctors at the Japanese Red Cross Society hospitals in Hiroshima and Nagasaki say that some two-thirds of the deaths among elderly hibakusha are probably from radiation-related cancers. And aside from the physical symptoms, the psychological trauma is still ever present.
No one who visits Hiroshima’s Peace Memorial Museum, or who sees the continued suffering of thousands of elderly survivors, can be in any doubt of the catastrophic and irreversible effects of nuclear weapons. Nor could they in good conscience argue that these weapons somehow act as guarantors of global security or protectors of humanity as a whole.
Of course, the bombs in the arsenals of nuclear-armed states today are far more powerful and destructive. And modern research only makes the case against them stronger. Studies suggest that the use of nuclear weapons now even on a limited scale would have disastrous and long-lasting consequences on human health, the environment, the climate, food production and socioeconomic development.
Health problems would span generations, with children of survivors facing significant risks from the genetic damage inflicted on their parents.
Seventy years after the dawn of the “nuclear age,” there may be no effective or feasible means of assisting a substantial portion of survivors in the immediate wake of a nuclear detonation.
And make no mistake. The devastation of a future bomb will show no respect for national borders. It is likely to ravage societies far beyond its intended target country. Which makes the continued existence of nuclear weapons and the risk that entails a global concern.
Faced with these conclusions, you might imagine that the international community would pull back from the brink of potential tragedy and take steps to eradicate these weapons.
Sadly, last year’s review conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which had the opportunity to advance disarmament, failed to do so.
The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement has called on states to negotiate an international agreement to prohibit the use of and completely eliminate nuclear weapons within a binding timetable. We reiterate that call today. The political will to rid the world of this menace must urgently be found.
Until the last nuclear weapon is eliminated, there are essential steps that nuclear states can and must take now to diminish the danger of another Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
It is imperative that these states and their allies reduce the role of nuclear weapons in their military plans, doctrines and policies, and cut the number of nuclear warheads on high-alert status. The current modernization and proliferation of nuclear arsenals is leading us toward potential catastrophe.
The horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the human suffering inflicted still hold powerful lessons. Obama’s landmark visit will surely be a powerful reminder of the terrible destruction that nuclear weapons wreak.
We must act on this reminder.
To truly pay homage to those whose lives were lost or irrevocably altered by the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, Obama’s visit must galvanize the international community to move without delay toward a world free of nuclear weapons.
The fact that these weapons have not been used over the past 70 years does not guarantee a risk-free future for our children. Only the prohibition and elimination of nuclear weapons can do that.