Editer l'article Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
Le blog de fukushima-is-still-news

information about Fukushima published in English in Japanese media info publiée en anglais dans la presse japonaise

No decision on Oi fault yet


November 4, 2012
Decision on Japan nuke plant fault line postponed



Experts have postponed a decision on whether a fault line underneath Japan's only operating nuclear power plant is active or what to do with the facility.

A five-member team commissioned by the Nuclear Regulation Agency inspected the Oi nuclear power plant in western Japan last week to examine a suspected fault line there.

Two of Oi's four reactors resumed operation in July for the first time since last year's nuclear crisis triggered by a quake and tsunami that hit other reactors in Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant in Fukushima Prefecture.

The experts agreed on Nov. 4 that part of Oi's underground structure slid as far back as 125,000 years ago but couldn't tell if it was because of an active fault line. They will meet again this week.

Chief regulator Shunichi Tanaka has suggested a plant closure if the fault line is judged active.



Watchdog inspectors divided on fault activity at Oi nuclear plant site


November 03, 2012




The government's nuclear industry watchdog on Nov. 2 inspected a geological fault line at the site of the Oi nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture, which some experts suspect could open up in a future earthquake.

The fault in question, called the "F-6 fracture zone," cuts across the Oi plant site in a north-south direction between the No. 2 and No. 3 reactors.

The Nuclear Regulation Authority has not offered an opinion on the possible risk as members of the survey team remained divided on the issue.

It is set to meet Nov. 4 to discuss the matter further after Kunihiko Shimazaki, the agency's deputy chairman, conducts his own assessment.

"Requesting additional surveys is one option," he said.

Experts have expressed concern that slippage of an active fault near the Oi plant could induce movement along the F-6 fracture zone, with catastrophic results.

At the behest of the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, the NRA's predecessor, Kansai Electric Power Co., the Oi plant operator, has been doing additional surveys since August. These have included work to expose geological formations.

KEPCO on Oct. 31 submitted an interim report to the NRA, saying it had so far found no data to contradict its previous assessment that the F-6 fracture zone is inactive.

It will issue a final report in December.

Four outside experts joined Shimazaki during the NRA's on-site fault survey on Nov. 2, where they inspected fault outcrops at two sites where KEPCO exposed geological formations.

The team members offered an array of opinions on the likelihood of fault activity.

Norio Shigematsu, a senior research scientist at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, said: "There was little evidence that geological formations had shifted because of the fault. I'm not able to jump to an immediate conclusion."

But Mitsuhisa Watanabe, a professor of geomorphology at Toyo University, said there was clear evidence that geological formations had shifted, but at what period in the past he could not say.

Daisuke Hirouchi, an associate professor of geography at Shinshu University, and Atsumasa Okada, a professor of active fault studies at Ritsumeikan University, both said they were unable to assess the activity of the fault until they knew more about when the fault shifted.

Geological time is deemed relevant because the government's current nuclear reactor construction guidelines define active faults as those that have shifted during the past 120,000 to 130,000 years. Thus, the conventional wisdom is that an active fault that slid recently may move again in the future.

Shimazaki has said the definition of active faults should be broadened to include those that have shifted during the past 400,000 years.

Experts are hard-pressed to identify when fault movements occurred, partly because of an inherent difficulty in assessing geological faults and a dearth of evidence.

When KEPCO built the Oi plant, it stripped off geological formations that would have helped to identify when the last fault activity occurred. A lack of evidential materials and photographs of the geological formations means that a re-examination of controversial sites is no longer possible as pipes were embedded in the bedrock.

An "emergency water intake channel," a vital part of the facility that is designed to receive seawater to cool down diesel generators and other emergency equipment, runs directly above the F-6 fracture zone.

The government's guideline on building nuclear facilities to withstand earthquakes says no key component of a plant should be built directly above an active fault.

NRA Chairman Shunichi Tanaka has said he will ask KEPCO to shut down the Oi plant if the fault is considered to be active.



Regulators study disputed fault at Oi nuke plant ***




The Nuclear Regulation Authority conducted a one-day investigation Friday at the Oi nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture to check whether a disputed fault running underneath it should be viewed as active.



Less than solid ground?: Inspectors from the Nuclear Regulation Authority on Friday check the geological stratum at Kansai Electric's Oi nuclear plant in Fukui Prefecture. KYODO 


Depending on the outcome of the investigation, Japan's only operating nuclear plant could be told to shut down, just months after two of its reactors were allowed to restart.

It is the first time the NRA, established in September, has conducted an on-site inspection at a nuclear plant.

At the government's request, Kansai Electric Power Co. is further studying the F-6 fault, which runs north to south, separating the plant's reactors 1 and 2 from units 3 and 4.

Kepco has said it has yet to find data suggesting movements in the last 120,000 to 130,000 years, the current definition of an active fault in Japan.

The NRA plans to make its own judgment based on Friday's check, which was carried out by a team consisting of NRA Commissioner Kunihiko Shimazaki and four other experts selected from outside the authority.

They include Toyo University professor Mitsuhisa Watanabe, who has highlighted the risk posed by the F-6 fault, where a zone of crushed rocks has been found in the bedrock.

The shattered zone will not trigger an earthquake, but it is feared it could move together with active faults near the plant and damage a water channel that would be used to take in seawater to cool the reactors in the event of an emergency.

Utilities are not allowed to build reactors and other related facilities important for safe operation of reactors directly above active faults.

Prior to the investigation, NRA Chairman Shunichi Tanaka said that if F-6 is determined to be active, or if it is strongly suspected, the authority would call for the currently operating reactors be shut down.

The investigation team is expected to meet Sunday to discuss the outcome of the on-site inspection.

The regulators plan to conduct similar investigations at five other nuclear facilities, including Hokuriku Electric Power Co.'s Shika plant in Ishikawa Prefecture and Kepco's Mihama plant in Fukui.

Partager cet article
Pour être informé des derniers articles, inscrivez vous :
Commenter cet article