Overblog
Editer l'article Suivre ce blog Administration + Créer mon blog
Le blog de fukushima-is-still-news

information about Fukushima published in English in Japanese media info publiée en anglais dans la presse japonaise

"Think about unthinkable disasters" (US report)

 

July 25, 2014

 

 

US scholars release report on Fukushima accident

 

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/english/news/20140725_14.html 

 

A US report on Fukushima's nuclear accident has pointed out measures that need to be taken in the future to protect residents from a serious nuclear disaster.

The National Academy of Sciences released the report on Thursday. It follows debates by a panel of experts that began in 2012 on the lessons from the Fukushima crisis.

The report notes that poor communication between the central government and local governments, as well as a lack of clear standards about radiation levels that require decontamination, led to public distrust in the government.

It says that the US government and nuclear operators should examine the way information is being given to residents of surrounding communities, as well as means of protecting the ill, elderly, and children.

It also notes that an assessment should be made of the impact of long-term evacuation on the lives of those affected.

The report will be submitted to Congress as a reference for the creation of future safety measures in a nuclear crisis.

Jul. 25, 2014 - Updated 03:35 UTC

 

 

 

U.S. Fukushima report: Think about unthinkable disasters

http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201407250027 

 

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS


WASHINGTON--A U.S. science advisory report says Japan's Fukushima nuclear accident offers a key lesson to the nation's nuclear industry: Focus more on the highly unlikely but worst case scenarios.


That means thinking about earthquakes, floods, tsunamis, solar storms, multiple failures and situations that seem freakishly unusual, according to the National Academy of Sciences report released on July 24. Those kinds of things triggered the world's three major nuclear accidents.


"We need to do a soul searching when it comes to the assumptions" of how to deal with worst case events, said University of Southern California engineering professor Najmedin Meshkati, the panel's technical adviser. Engineers should "think about something that could happen once every, perhaps 1,000 years" but that's not really part of their training or nature, he said.


"You have to totally change your mode of thinking because complacency and hubris is the worst enemy to nuclear safety," Meshkati said in an interview.


The report said the 2011 Japanese accident, caused by an earthquake and tsunami, should not have been a surprise. The report says another Japanese nuclear power plant also hit by the tsunami was closer to the quake's fault. But the Onagawa plant wasn't damaged because quakes and flooding were considered when it was built.


Onagawa had crucial backup electricity available for when the main power went down, as opposed to Fukushima which had emergency generators in a basement that flooded. Onagawa's operators had "a different mindset" than the executives who ran Fukushima, Meshkati said.


The other two nuclear accidents--at Pennsylvania's Three Mile Island and Ukraine's Chernobyl--were caused by multiple system failures.


Lee Clarke, a Rutgers University risk expert and author of the book "Worst Cases," criticized the academy's report as too weak. He said the tone of the report made it seem like the accident was unpredictable and caught reasonable people by surprise "and it shouldn't have." But the report itself said the "the Fukushima accident was not a technical surprise."


David Lochbaum of the activist group Union of Concerned Scientists said the problem is that federal law financially protects the U.S. nuclear industry from accidents and gives utilities little incentive to spend money on low-probability, high-consequence problems.


But Nuclear Energy Institute senior vice president Anthony Pietrangelo said the American nuclear industry has already taken several steps to shore up backup power and deal with natural disasters.

"We cannot let such an accident happen here," he said in a statement.


Another issue the report raised was about how far radiation may go in a worst case accident.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission orders plants to have emergency plans for a zone of 10 miles around a nuclear plant. But the academy study said Fukushima showed that "may prove inadequate" if a similar accident happened in the U.S. People nearly 19 miles away in Japan needed protection from radiation. But the committee would not say what would be a good emergency zone.


See also  in the Japan Times :

 

U.S. Fukushima study: Think about unthinkable disasters

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/07/25/national/science-health/u-s-fukushima-study-think-unthinkable-disasters/#.U9JQi7Hi91s 

 

AP


A U.S. science advisory report says the Fukushima nuclear accident offers a key lesson to America’s nuclear industry: Focus more on the highly unlikely but worst case scenarios.


[...]

 

David Lochbaum of the activist group Union of Concerned Scientists said the problem is that federal law financially protects the U.S. nuclear industry from accidents, which gives utilities little incentive to spend money on low-probability, high-consequence problems.


But Nuclear Energy Institute Senior Vice President Anthony Pietrangelo said the American nuclear industry has already taken several steps to shore up backup power and deal with natural disasters.


“We cannot let such an accident happen here,” he said in a statement.


Another issue the report raises is about how far radiation may go in a worst case accident.


The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission orders plants to have emergency plans for a zone of 10 miles (16 km) around a nuclear plant. But the academy study said Fukushima No. 1 showed that “may prove inadequate” if a similar accident happened in the U.S.


People 30 km away in Fukushima needed protection from radiation. But the committee would not say what would be a good emergency zone.

Partager cet article
Repost0
Pour être informé des derniers articles, inscrivez vous :
Commenter cet article